A
male
age
51-59,
anonymous
writes:A few weeks ago I took some professional photos of a beautiful Caribbean girl with very large breasts. I had asked her to put on underwear that was slightly transparent. She refused to put it on because of the panties being a bit see-through. I deduced from this that she was embarassed because I and others would see her bush through her panties. She proposed to wear the champagne underwear she had on but to take off her bra to reveal her breasts. Quite a few black hairs peeked out of the sides of her panties but she did not seem embarassed by this. Why was she embarassed at the prospect of all her bush being seen through panties but not about the many hairs curling from under her panties?
View related questions:
bra , breasts, underwear Reply to this Question
Share |
Fancy yourself as an agony aunt? Add your answer to this question! A
male
reader, anonymous, writes (15 March 2008): It's not a question of pubic hair at all. That's from your perspective. It was a matter of the line between personal dignity and shame in **her mind.** Breasts on parade with champange panties on = "do you think I'm sexy?" etc. But to wear "see-thru" panties = "just as bad as being photographed naked."Focusing on the issue of pubic hair here = can't see the forest for the trees. --H2H
A
female
reader, Fairy_Lu +, writes (25 February 2008):
 Your a proffessional photographer i believe its your job to pose and take photo's of models not concern yourself with body hair, maybe she was growing her hair for a bikini wax maybe she thought you could airbrush out it or maybe just maybe she didnt realise, but why care so much?
...............................
A
female
reader, anonymous, writes (25 February 2008): perhaps she wasn't at all embarrassed about having hair there but instead was worried about her lips being visible....god if that was all I had to worry about all day wether or not I could see a guys pubic hair I would consider myself a pretty pathetic human being! I would say you are not a proffessional photographer at all.
...............................
A
female
reader, eyeswideopen  +, writes (25 February 2008):
 Why do you care?
...............................
A
female
reader, speedcat +, writes (25 February 2008):
Why you putting so much thought into a girl you dont even know? Really who cares why she didnt want to show her bush ,,,this question is silly,,, maybe she was unaware of the flyaway hairs that were sticking out of the sides!!!!
...............................
A
reader, anonymous, writes (25 February 2008): This is probably one of the silliest questions I have ever seen on this site, not sure it even deserves an answer....but did it ever occur to you that she was not AWARE of the few stray hairs peeking out, and that she thought she was completely covered? I guess she was trying to have a modicum of modesty about her but failed.
...............................
A
reader, anonymous, writes (25 February 2008): This is a joke right!!!!. I read your post and I am still laughing at the scenario.
...............................
A
female
reader, Lucy2118 +, writes (25 February 2008):
 This many have been because with the see through knickers everything was on show and although with her knickers some of her was showing but it wasn't everything. Sometimes when girl do thing like that they like to keep some of their dignity. Hope this helps.
X
...............................
|
