martini, posted
over a year ago
First of all, those 10 points were not mine. I took them from another post from Craigslist. The link is here: http://vancouver.craigslist.org/about/best/phx/167335230.html - as you can see, it was posted on June 2nd, 2006, where as mine was June 13th on my blog page.
If you want to go rant your ass off, you can do there instead.
As for why I am against Christianity - I am not. I am against religion as a whole. However, Christianity has ALWAYS been the one to come up in almost everything I associate myself with before I learned to NOT associate myself with it in the first place.
I may have an unreasonable amount of patience for many things, but I have a very low tolerance for people who exert religion on others - who talk about religion as they say that they do not judge others, yet they have the tenacity to say they themselves know the truth. THAT IN ITSELF IS A JUDGEMENT.
You say you don't judge others. Just because your thoughts are unspoken, does not mean you do not judge others. You proclaim that you know the truth. That means that everyone else is following the wrong thing. You say you have no problem for others believing in whatever they believe in as long as you believe in what you believe in.
In Christianity (as with many other single-god religions), the religion is absolute. There is NO SUCH THING AS MULTI-VARIOUS interpretations. THE REASON WHY SO MANY RELIGIOUS PEOPLE HAVE A MULTITUDE OF interpretations is the absolute fact that religion itself is NOT DEFINED. YET YOU HAVE THE TENACITY TO SAY IT IS THE TRUTH.
BY WHAT MATTER, SUBJECT, AND HISTORICAL EVENT THAT YOU YOURSELF AS AN INDIVIDUAL HAS HAD THE opportunity to witness and experience to say that YOUR RELIGION IS THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH?
I once had the opportunity to argue the case of religion with someone who was a lot more in-tuned with his religion than most that I have had the chance to meet and/or talk with. His usual argument with me was to ask, "Why not?"
I told him that I understand why religion must exist on this planet. Without it, many people will not have a focus in their lives. Many people need religion as a form of self-realization that do in fact exist for a purpose higher than themselves alone.
He asked me if someone had attacked my beliefs, shouldn't I be hurt. I grinned and answered that I would not. If I was a person who only focusses myself on a religion, and use that to live through life in this world, than sure, I may cry and become overly defensive. However, I do not need religion to tell me who I am and what my purpose is in this world, in this life. Thus, your rants, as well as Anja's sparked a sensitive cord in my moral code.
It is the usual 'tactic' that I have experienced throughout my entire 22 years since I've gained self-awareness, that 90% of the Christians I have met or talk with would counter attack, or declare a defensive position for the supposed peace they have achieved through their own religion, then when they have made their voices heard, they would quickly shut down the argument and say, "I don't want to talk about this anymore. I don't want to hear what you have to say because what you have to say does not involve me."
The just of it. Of course, there are many other verbal forms - some more polite, others more blunt.
I am very intolerant of Christians. Alas, I have three Christian friends - very close ones. One of them I have known for 20 years this month. Never once in my entire life that we've been friends, has he every preached his beliefs to me. The only time I ever hear ANYTHING to do with Christianity from him is when he invites me to his religious events. The other friend who is Christian is not so tactful, but that's a story I will not get into. Then the last friend who is Christian whom her boyfriend, which is my brother who is more Buddhist gave a lot, sacrificed a lot for her. I questioned my brother and said, "You would accept a church wedding for her, yet she absolutely declines to step foot in a temple for Guan Yin because she feels it is against her beliefs. I feel very insulted. If she wasn't your wife-to-be, she would not be my friend and future sister."
I wish, with all of my heart, that religion be abolished and that people start learning about themselves, their families, their duties and obligations to the state. Following religion is fine IF it was unified. Alas, if Christianity was absolute, or if Islam is absolute, etc, then wouldn't the people of the world be unified then?
Then would there be no denominations or factions of a belief? Then would there be no versions and 'necessary' translations for the Bible or the Koran?
If a religion is absolute, then the point of having a separated people, having separated ideals, having the emotions of lust and torment - would they all not contradict the whole idea of a religion being absolute? Rather than it starting in one place of the world at a time when the world was torn asunder by the egos of an emperor?
Of course not. It doesn't work that way. If today someone who resembles a son of god were to come out, the world's population would ridicule that person because of learned wit and intelligence. Of course, 2000 years ago, people burned women at a stake, just because she can practice medicine, heal people using alternative means, or believe in another invisible man. 2000 years later, if we were to hang a woman or burn her at a stake for practicing Buddhism or using Chih-Gong or Pagan worshipping or anything like that, those same people would go to jail.
Assumptions you say? I never say all. I always say relativity. For my last example, I have a cousin who I had the opportunity to become friends with a long time ago. Back then, he was a very good person, laid back enough, and loved to play and joke. Years later, after he joined a church in the UK, he came back to Hong Kong, and every day, he would denounce my aunt and uncle and his sister for not becoming Christians. He continued to pester them saying that they will not be saved, will go to hell and burn forever. He would then cry and burst out of the house, slamming the doors, and going to his church where the pastor would calm him and say pretty much what you have said.
Anyway, bottom line is that, my only problem with religion of today is that people exert their will even when they don't verbally say it. As with Malyce Synn, I believe in oneness - unity, togetherness. I love that idea. I wish that the people of this world can do it, but it can't and it will never happen. Lest it turns out like the world in Equilibrium.
IF YOU TRULY believe in your own beliefs, then NOTHING I say can make you cry or make you sad, or at the very least, make u upset. Like a tree, it serves its purpose to create air, to create seeds, to create flowers. If you attack it with your sword, it may bleed sap, but it will continue to grow and serve its purpose. Unless of course, you strike it down and make it into firewood.
As with I, the only thing I 'need' to do to stand up for my beliefs, is to be myself. When people of religion cause strife, to attach my beliefs, I laugh whole-heartedly and say this, "And exactly what are you attacking? My beliefs are infallible, because it exists only in here [points to my heart] and no where else. It needs not to be written. It needs not have churches nor temples be built for it. It needs not pastors, priests, nuns, or monks to preach it. And finally, it need not congretations of men and women, boys and girls to follow it."
[bows]
Posted on 28 August 2006 @ 1:15 (London time) - permalink
(Log in to flag spam/offensive/junk messages to moderators)
|